吃中药要谨慎了-同仁堂牛黄松毒片含拥有巨万量拥损害毒斋

2019年9月10日 0 By admin

  英中药品局:同仁堂牛黄松毒片含拥有巨万量拥损害毒斋

  阿思臻克畅通信社8月21日讯 英中药品及保健品办署(MHRA)周壹在官网上颁布匹了壹则中药正告,称此雕刻些中药含拥有巨万量的拥损害毒斋,带拥有铅、水银以及砷,就中壹款产品厂商是国际的同仁堂(600085.SH)。

  此次被正告的产品拥有北边京同仁堂的牛黄松毒片、保灵堂的白凤丸以及恒隆昌的发珍。此雕刻几款产品邑不被任命权却以进入英国市场,但考查人员还是在市场中发皓此雕刻些药物。

  就中的白凤丸之前就在香港被召回,缘由是铅的含量是正日含量的两倍。而发珍内所含的水银成分是规范的11倍。据瑞典国度食品办局称,他们发皓北边京同仁堂消费的牛黄松毒片中含拥有巨万量的砷。

  什么是砷

  砷是壹种以拥有毒而著名的类金属,并拥有好多的同斋异形体。砷的氧募化物叫做砒霜,拥有剧毒。是铜稀炼的副产品。

  use poison to attack poison is the essence of traditional chinese medicine.

  同仁堂回应牛黄松毒片含毒:中外面规范不比招致

  搜狐财经讯 英中药品及保健品办署(MHRA)周壹在官网上颁布匹了壹则中药正告,称此雕刻些中药含拥有巨万量的拥损害毒斋,带拥有铅、水银以及砷,此次被正告的产品拥有北边京同仁堂的牛黄松毒片。

  搜狐财经电话包线北边京同仁堂科技展开股份拥有限公司的产品工干人员,该工干人员说,我们曾经关怀到此雕刻条音耗,条是觉得此音耗比较片面,我们的牛黄松毒片是经度过国度规则消费的,经度过国度装置然的规范;还拥有坚硬是两国的用药规范不比样。

  谈到此种拥损害毒斋能否影响到人体强大健时,该工干人员体即兴,鉴于中药和正西药是不比样的,中药考据壹个配伍,各种拥有毒斋的药物匹配在壹道会宗到壹定的中和,毒斋也会免去。

  数月前,同仁堂多款产品曝出产汞超标注和丹砂成分超标注,北边京同仁堂24日发表发出产音皓称:北边京同仁堂公司消费的牛黄令女散、小男到珍丸,严峻依照国度药品规范加以工、消费和销特价而沽,不存放在丹砂超标注效实,患者遵医嘱依照药品运用说皓书服用是装置然拥有效的。此音皓被指拥好吃懒做.

  以毒攻毒拥有什么迷信根据?

  从生物学的不雅概念到来看,水银却与体内器官蛋清结合,破开变质或投降低体内器官的干用,形成对体内器官不成叛逆转的损伤。

  i’m just saying a fact.

  Modern science cannot explain anything/everything in the universe.

  I believe one does not even need modern science to understand 以毒攻毒 is BS. We have something else that is called common sense.

  Now just for the fun of it, let’s suppose 以毒攻毒 is not BS. Then i argue Chinese people already have the purest bodies in the world and therefore do not need any extra medicine. You see, they already breathe in poisonous air and eat poisonous foods everyday — that’s plenty of free treatment. Why pay more?

  such a narrow minded statement.

  nobody would ask you to take poisonous matters blindly, definitely not Chinese traditional medicine.

  Just like you don’t take western medicine blindly, as simple as that.

  The overdose of HG Ar(or AS) might be a result of human errors or flaws in manufacturing.

  In fact vaccination is a perfect example of yi du gong du.

  If I do not have flu but I take a flu vaccination, does this vaccination poison me? if vaccine alone does not poison me, then why do I define it as poison?

  I am aware there is an ongoing debate on vaccines and some people claim they are poisonous. But some others claim they are not…I believe you belong to the former group.

  I define poison as common sense poison, as something that harms you when you take it alone.

  I guess my definition is just wrong.

  BTW before I traveled to Africa, doctors recommended that I took at least 7 extra vaccines. in your definition, they just asked me to get 7 shots of poisons.

  how do you know? Don’t u remember you need to answer a long list of questions before flu vaccination?

  It’s all up to the doze/volumn you take and individual human body, right?

  Human body is not 0 tolerant/100% vulnerable. It can flush things out.

  I think this argument has sound logic and covers something I never cared to think about before. Thanks. Good education for me.